top of page
Search

Last month (19th February) Loops of Learning conversations for 2023 kicked off. These conversations happen once a month on a Sunday morning and the sessions are freely available to anyone wishing to attend.


It's been a couple of years journey to get to where I am in understanding and clarifying what Loops of Learning is and what it hopes to achieve and I started this new year with a sense of clarity.


If you've followed the journey thus far, you'll understand that I have a keen interest in Systems Thinking and Systems Leadship Theory, and aIso have strong desire to create positive change in the world.


The past two years have explored quite a number of conversations and styles of faciliation, but this year I plan to be a lot more focussed on using Systems Thinking / Dynamics tools and methods to help people see the interconnections of our society. This includes the systems in which we live and how they connect and intersect.


Our February session was honed individualism. I have a hypothesis that over the past fifty to one hundred years there has been a rise in individualism which has increased polarisation in politics (see the rise of the far-right and far-left) and is making it increasingly difficult to deal with the complex societal problems that involve agreements over common-ground (ie, think about our inability to agree to reactions to climate change globally).


After an hour or so of conversation discussing what individualism is, and how it plays out, as well as considering the positives and negatives of individualism we discussed the factors that have influenced the move in the West towards a much more individualistic society.


The factors we considered were:

  • Banking changes that have encouraged a rise in debt, making it easier to compete and 'buy' things that focus us on our own wealth and status.

  • Shifts in our information feeds, particularly through social media. This has made it harder to access unbiased information and has increased comfirmation bias towards a consumerist, capitalist model of individual wealth. Advertising also plays an important part here as we are heavily influenced by marketing that encourages us to buy more stuff!

  • Shift in Post industrial education models - which on a positive note has encourage increased self-confidence and self-worth, but has also diminished the connection to community and family as a unit of 'we'. The focus has become 'I' rather than 'we'.

  • Technological advancements such as personal computers, mobile phones and social media have made it much easier to be independent and self-orientated. This also connects back to social media and advertising.

  • Neoliberialism and the policies of 1980's America and the UK have encouraged a corporate and community culture that's driven by free enterprise, freedom of individual action and the pursuit of profit. This 'people before profits' approach isn't new, but has proliferated through corporate Western cultures and favours individual gain.

  • Rise in atheism has increased the 'worship of self' and decreased the connection to a collective religious identity.

  • Changes in psychological practices and growth in neuroscientific knowledge has shifted mental health treatments and diagnosis to be more self-focussed. The rise in motivational, psychological methods that promote the idea that we are all in control of our own destiny and can 'succeed' if only we throw off our self-made shackles, reinforce individualism. There has also been a marked shift away from 'truth' and scientific 'fact' towards a post-modern concept of truth in context. We've moved towards using language like 'I feel that...' when talking about issues or concerns and away from terms like 'I think that....'. The past few years has seen shifts in language to present stories as 'My Truth...' rather than an objective absolute truth that may exist as something factually correct. This ultimately promotes that the reality of the indivdual is stronger than the reality of the collective.

Having unpacked these key factors in conversation, I introduced a new tool to the group which is often used in Community Based Systems Dynamics workshops, Graphs Over Time.


Each person at the workshop created a graph of a story related to the above factors impacting individualism and I built a story of individualism over time, from the perspectives of those present.

A graph showing perceived growth and decline in individualism

The graphs we created, will become the starting talking points for our next session. You don't need to have been involved in the creation to engage in community conversations around these objects. Come along for the ride... and hopefully pick up some new tips and tricks along the social change journey!

A glorious sunny day, and a COVID-19 peak in Victoria led us to have a small group and an outside session. The colourful Lorikeets in the tree above us came to join too, producing some competition in noise, which seemed appropriate for the question we were exploring:


What are the consequences of encouraging competitiveness in our workplace and communities?


"I don't like competition", was one of our opening comments. "I don't engage in it".


This opened up a plethora of thoughts, considerations and explorations of competition, the context of competition and the intended and unintended consequences of it.


We agreed that the construct of competition makes a difference. Those in artistic fields felt that it diminished the ability be truly creative as it produced pressure that closed mind and stifled the thought process. Those in corporate settings felt it lowered trust and increased stress levels.


Community groups were also discussed as competition for grants and funding is often rife, but it was agreed that within this setting there are often collaborations that occur that create co-operation between community groups that wouldn't otherwise exist. It was, however, acknowledged that being beholden to the grant funding model can create difficult intellectual property battles in areas such as health sciences or other areas of innovative exploration, often where scarcity to large funding arrangements exist (ie, scientific research).


The intended and unintended consequences the group came up with were:


Intended Consequences

- Motivates - self and others

- Growth (personal and professional)

- Pushes individual and groups to improve and strive for excellence

- Promotes individualism (the strive for the personal best)

- Enables us to tap in to our potential

- Sparks creativity

- Increases productivity

- Gives individuals the chance to assess their strengths and weaknesses

- Increases the quality of work

- Creates focus and can increase stamina

- Reduces dissonance - keeps people distracted and 'in-line'

- Creates feelings of 'fun'


Unintended Consequences

- Scarcity breeds competitiveness and this trait is easily manipulated

- Encourages a 'winners are grinners' culture which diminishes diversity

- It's reductive and causes people to lose sight of the bigger picture, particularly in settings with Key Performance Indicators that are narrowly focused

- Encourages a 'survival of the fittest' mindset

- Supports an alpha-male, patriarchal construct

- Encourages sabotaging behaviour (particularly in highly competitive IP driven environments)

- Pain of losing can out weigh any sense of gain and create deeply negative emotions*

- The societal pedestal of the 'super-man' - athletic superstars are lauded

- Inequality is perpetuated

- Co-operation is diminished as winners coset their knowledge or skills

- Trust decreases

- Stress levels increase


*Loss Aversion is a cognitive bias that describes why, for individuals, the pain of losing is psychologically twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining.


Are there examples where cooperative, low competitive societies have thrived?

Skara Brae is a Neo-Lithic site in the Orkney Islands of Scotland which could be considered an example of early co-operative living. The site dates back to 2500BC and shows evidence of cooperative farming at a very early stage of human existence. There is archaeological evidence of creative pursuits, but no evidence of weaponry.


This moves me to remember a Tyson Yunkporta quote, from his 'sand talk',


"We want shelter, food, strong relationships, a livable habitat, stimulating learning activity and time to perform valued tasks in which we excel'. Is this only achievable in a competitive environment?


I leave you pondering whether we MUST have competition and whether the unintended consequences out weigh the intended ones.?


References / Further Reading





MEMBERSHIP

©LindaOliveri2021_Loops of Learning_18March_0388_JPEG sRGB.jpg

CONVERSATIONAL DINNERS
& SPEAKER EVENTS

Attend one of our monthly conversational dinners and share your ideas with others. 

Be challenged and inspired at one of our speaker events.

WORKSHOPS & WEBINARS

Book in a webinar or a facilitated workshop that encourages a bigger picture approach.

Email for more information.

bottom of page